pratiyogita kiran Published this article page no 01 Why India rejected? Indias contention was that the resolution ignored the military invasion by Pakistan and placing both nations on an equal diplomatic ground was a dismissal of Pakistans aggression and the fact that the Maharaja of Kashmir Hari Singh had signed the Instrument of Accession. India also objected to the Resolutions requirement that did not allow India to retain military presence which it believed it needed for defence. The Resolutions order to form a coalition government would also put Sheikh Abdullah the Prime Minister of the Princely State of Jammu & Kashmir in a difficult position. India also believed that the powers conferred on the Plebiscite Administrator undermined the states sovereignty. India also wanted Pakistan to be excluded from the operations of the plebiscite. Why Pakistan rejected? Pakistan on the other hand objected to even the minimum presence of Indian forces in Kashmir as allowed by the resolution. It also wanted an equal representation in the state government for the Muslim Conference which was the dominant party in Pakistaniheld Kashmir. Final outcome Despite their differences with the provisions of Resolution 47 both India and Pakistan welcomed the UN Commission and agreed to work with it pratiyogita kiran buy.
No comments:
Post a Comment